World Record Attempt
 

It looks like Calvin (The guy behind AITP) is going for the world record attempt he's been mentioning.


More information on the facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/aitpworldrecord

wow! They should, of course, have the cars arranged in model sequence - with the 8's leading! +++

That's a cracking idea.

I so will be a part of it +++
And I can't see A8s not leading that pack and A1 being at the very back :D
It's a pure common sense

errr, R8's?

"A" comes before "R"? ......, However, the flaw of that argument is that the S8s will be third.:(

ARS it is :D

Size order?

Why don't we do S8's, A8's, S7's A7's etc down to A1
Then 4x4's Q7, Q5, Q3
Then Sports cars R8's
Job done S8's and A8's still top of the tree ??

W12's????:ROFL:

Logic is wrong 1 to 8 works better as you keep the best till last

Cant agree with "the best is last" approach. Do you see Mo Farah leading from the back?

Should it be D2s then D3s and then D4s:p

(By the way, if you think this is occupying our (biased) minds, just think what the organiser's are going through!)

Perhaps it's too contentious to do it by model. Let's go by colour - I don't think my Aqua Blue D2 will be far from the front. Or we could by drivers name.

Regards

A A Aardvark. :ROFL:

Do it by age?

lets do it by best spec first

so im in front +++

Your car is confused.
So it drops several spaces.

Possibly behind me.

I think they should do it by adding together the engine size designations and with the first digit coming higher in ranking than the second so -

3.7 = 3 + 7 = 10
2.8 = 2 + 8 = 10
5.2 = 5 + 2 = 7
6.0 = 6
4.2 = 4 + 2 = 6
4.0 = 4
3.0 = 3

Perfect!! :D

That made me :ROFL: Neil, I knew you'd devise a way to be in front +++

I agree, but keep going until you have a single digit:

3.7 = 3 + 7 = 10; 1+0 =1
2.8 = 2 + 8 = 10; 1+0 =1
5.2 = 5 + 2 = 7
6.0 = 6
4.2 = 4 + 2 = 6
4.0 = 4
3.0 = 3

So 3.7s and 2.8s at the back please! :D

There is no argument here. I go first +++

Or by BHP..