A8 Parts Forum  

Go Back   A8 Parts Forum > A8 D3 > D3 - Transmission

D3 - Transmission Gearboxes, diffs, drive shafts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th September 2016, 09:35 AM
ainarssems ainarssems is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rushden, Northants
Posts: 3,847
Default

Maybe a silly question as both companies are well regarded professionals but have they done adaption procedure after oil replacement, see screenshot from Audi self study programme.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.JPG
Views:	584
Size:	37.0 KB
ID:	14325  
__________________
Currently 8less
2011 Q7 S Line 3.0TDI, 2016 Tesla Model S 90D

8 history:
2006 A8 Sport 4.2TDI quattro SOLD,
1997 S8, reached end of life with gearbox failure
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 7th September 2016, 03:22 PM
Turbo Tony's Avatar
Turbo Tony Turbo Tony is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West London
Posts: 717
Default

Wow, thanks everyone for your posts. There's some really good info there. Initially, I did think about driving the car to ZF, but I thought they stopped accepting customers? I can't remember where I'd read that.

Please, don't fret about recommending BBA Reman. A couple of the reviews mentioned that they used to be really good, so there's no way you'd know what happened since.

That quote from Audi sounds exactly like what's happened to mine, but Mackies tried to erase the adaption, to no effect.

I'm not convinced it's the ECU. Mackie told me they didn't need to update the ECU because it was already on the latest firmware. That's a worry, considering it was only changed to LG8 fluid at Mackies, so it must have either been running LG8 fluid before (remember it was short-filled) or it had the wrong software installed. Alternatively, I suppose it's possible that the software could have been corrupt already, which is why it wouldn't accept the update. They may have mistaken it not accepting the update for it being up-to-date.

I spoke to CT today and they are going to use another company to check over the ECU. They're based in Nottingham, so wanted my permission to drive it there later this week, which I gave. Frustratingly, they didn't give me price for this check. The worrying part is that they called ZF, who told them that there isn't a clutch per gear on these gearboxes. They use a combination of clutches and the same clutch is used between 1 & 2 and going into 6. When Mackies test drove it, it started clunking mildly going into 6, so I think it's pretty likely that clutch is at fault, which means a gearbox rebuild.

CT still think it's worth getting the ECU looked at, but I told them the likely reason there are no deposits in the fluid is because the car's only done 11 miles since the fault first appeared.

I am grateful that they're trying all they can to prevent the need of a rebuild, but, in my head at least, it's looking more and more likely to be what's needed.

...One steerage-class ticket to Brokesville, please.
__________________
Storytellers Villa Orlando

2008 Audi S8
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7th September 2016, 03:27 PM
Delboy's Avatar
Delboy Delboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lowestoft, Suffolk
Posts: 2,492
Default

What's the story warranty wise Tony did you get any when you bought it?
__________________
Del

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th September 2016, 03:37 PM
Turbo Tony's Avatar
Turbo Tony Turbo Tony is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West London
Posts: 717
Default

Hi Del,

Yes, CT have spoken to the warranty company and they basically spewed their usual line-up of excuses. The work done so far is not covered under the list of covered parts (which is true). If it turns out to be the gearbox, it's not covered because the car hasn't technically 'broken down'. You name it, they've used it.
__________________
Storytellers Villa Orlando

2008 Audi S8
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7th September 2016, 04:28 PM
Delboy's Avatar
Delboy Delboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lowestoft, Suffolk
Posts: 2,492
Default

Define broken down, if the car is not driving properly that's broken from in every ones train of thought, don't let that ****ers roll you over
__________________
Del

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7th September 2016, 04:54 PM
pete-p's Avatar
pete-p pete-p is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Somewhere near Wexford
Posts: 668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo Tony View Post
Hi Del,

Yes, CT have spoken to the warranty company and they basically spewed their usual line-up of excuses. The work done so far is not covered under the list of covered parts (which is true). If it turns out to be the gearbox, it's not covered because the car hasn't technically 'broken down'. You name it, they've used it.
If you've bought it from a trader within the last six months, try quoting the Sale of Goods act

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-new...d-car-top-tips
__________________
Cars...
'93 Audi Coupe 2.0 Alpine White (sold)
'99 Audi S4 Merlin Purple - K04 upgrade to 412hp (sold)
'00 Audi S8 Agate Grey (Sold )
'11 Audi Q7 4.2tdi Unknown Red (Classic Red Pearl Effect - thanks MJ)

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 7th September 2016, 06:49 PM
Turbo Tony's Avatar
Turbo Tony Turbo Tony is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West London
Posts: 717
Default

I didn't think of using the SoG act. THat's a good one, thanks.

I was going to use the line that the car is bad enough to be injurious to the health of anyone in it, because the clunk and the hesitation is violent enough to cause whiplash in any of the car's occupants. It really is pretty darned severe and I'm not sure that would have come across in the conversations they had with CT.
__________________
Storytellers Villa Orlando

2008 Audi S8
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 7th September 2016, 08:26 PM
paulrstaylor paulrstaylor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,317
Default

If your going the SoG route, you need to direct that at the seller - not the warranty company. The warranty is in addition to your statutory rights from the purchase, if the contract with the warranty company isn't worth the paper it is written on then you need to ignore that go direct to the seller for them to resolve
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.