![]() |
|
Daily banter For everything, and anything that doesnt fit in elsewhere |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Its a good question about the alternator and it worried me slightly. Voltphreaks website says it should put out a minimum of 14V which would theoretically charge each cell to 3.5V per cell, which should be fine. http://www.voltphreaks.com/technologydir.php In the video my alternator is outputting only 13.6V which would be too low. However I kept an eye on the alternator, after a short drive it seems to build up the output to 14V or 14.1V so its just about ok. At some point I would like to clean up all the connectors between battery and alternator. At some point when I get round to it I would like to change or modify the voltage regulator in the alternator. So far the system seems to be working ok, sometimes after a longer drive the battery holds as much as 13.4V so its getting a fairly good charge, and seems to be able to last 7 days without driving and hasn't triggered the Low Voltage cutoff yet. You have a great idea for putting together your own battery much cheaper than the ready made ones. I'm not as confident with electronics ![]() Quote:
The advantage of lipo is power density, they can output much more current for the same capacity as LiFePo4. One of the downsides seems to be volatility (some people say), they seem to go into thermal runaway more easily. But this may be mostly due to the fact that they are used in more demanding conditions drawing high current on the very limit of the battery (like in RC jets). Also I don't know how lipo compare in longevity, can LiFePo4 last for more cycles? I dont know. I don't think they are cheaper either, if you look at Hobbyking for some of the cheapest ones, I think a 10Ah 3 cell is close to £100, the option Ainars posted for 20Ah LiFePo4 cells is a much better price and double the capacity. Last edited by Goran; 6th June 2015 at 08:31 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LiFePo are considerably safer in use than LiPo (which isn't actually a battery chemistry, but a construction) and straight LiPos are not really suited to automotive use as I've said before - far too much risk of a thermal runaway, just from aging as much as any in use abuse.
They're only good for a certain number of cycles as well.... I have a 3 cell LiPo I used for my RC radio and it's beginning to swell after intermittent use over a period of years - it still balance charges fine so I will continue to use it, but as soon as it swells good and proper it'll be dunked in salt water and binned
__________________
===SOLD===2002 Audi S8 D2 Final Edition (yes, really) in Avus Silver with purple extended leather===SOLD=== 2011 S5 Sportback in Phantom Black with black Super Sports leather, 9x20s, tech pack high, adaptive xenon plus, intelligent key, memory seats pack, sunroof, B&O, Audi Drive Select & quattro Sports Diff, DAB, parking system plus 2015 VW Golf GTI Performance Pack in Carbon Grey with black Vienna leather, tech pack (Discovery Pro nav & Dynaudio), DCC, factory towbar and retrofit RVC |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Have to agree, I would be scared of using and leaving Lipo batteries in a car.
Modern ones are quite good, for example I have some 3 or 4 year old lipos of only 850mah, used in rc jets drawing 20A fairly regularly and they have not puffed and capacity still seems to be good. But there are too many cases of fires especially when charging. Even for the LiFePo4 that's in my car now I bought some very high temperature insulation which I'm going to install soon for peace of mind. Its Pyrogel XT flexible sheets (I wanted XTF but could not get hold of it). I forgot to add, the recent 787 fires were LiFePo4 weren't they? That worries me a bit. Last edited by Goran; 6th June 2015 at 01:36 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|